Skip to content
Risk Solution

Risk assessment software that follows the hazard all the way to verified control.

Sophtri lets teams create area and equipment assessments, document hazards, assign administrative and engineering controls, generate work requests, and recalculate residual risk after implementation.

Structured risk reviews

Move assessments from draft to submitted, reviewed, and approved status in one workflow.

Action items tied to control type

Track administrative and engineering controls differently while keeping them on one risk record.

Residual risk visibility

Reassess the hazard after implementation so teams can prove whether the control worked.

Trust and proof

Buying teams need workflow fit, industry context, and measurable pilot outcomes.

Sophtri sales conversations stay anchored in operational control, audit-ready records, and the metrics a team can actually review during rollout.

See proof pages
Supported standards

ISO-aligned and OSHA PSM-supporting workflows

Sophtri is designed around structured approvals, documented information, corrective action, and audit-ready operational records.

Industries in scope

Built for power, oil and gas, petrochemical, manufacturing, mining, and construction

The platform is positioned for industrial operations where work control, traceability, and role-based accountability matter every day.

Connected workflows

Incidents, JSA, permits, CAPA, audits, and maintenance in one operating model

Teams can move from issue capture to approval, execution, verification, and closeout without rebuilding the record trail in separate tools.

Pilot metrics

Permit turnaround, CAPA aging, audit preparation, and closeout evidence

Proof conversations stay anchored in measurable operational outcomes instead of generic software feature claims.

Where teams struggle

High-risk operations break down when workflow context gets split across tools.

Sophtri turns risk assessment into an operational workflow. Teams can capture context, document hazards, add controls, submit the assessment for review, and then manage the downstream action items needed to reduce exposure. For engineering controls, the workflow can continue into work request, JSA, and permit execution before the residual risk is recalculated.

!

Risk registers often stop at identification and never prove whether controls were actually implemented.

!

Engineering controls need work packages, JSAs, and permits, but those steps are rarely connected back to the originating hazard.

!

Approvals and reviews are hard to track when assessments live in static spreadsheets or PDFs.

!

Teams cannot see the difference between planned controls and controls that are installed, verified, and reducing residual risk.

How Sophtri solves it

Built around the real operating sequence, not isolated forms.

Area and equipment context

Capture the production area, activities, headcount, housekeeping conditions, and other context before hazards are reviewed.

Hazards and control ownership

Attach control type, owner, due date, and description directly to the hazard record.

Administrative and engineering workflows

Handle briefing-style controls and engineered changes with the right downstream work path.

Work-request, JSA, and PTW linkage

Create the work package needed for engineering controls without leaving the risk context behind.

Workflow example

A controlled path from initiation to verified closeout.

01

Create the assessment

A user opens a new area or equipment assessment, selects the scale set, and enters the operational context.

02

Document hazards and controls

Each hazard receives control type, description, owner, and target date before the record moves forward.

03

Submit, review, and approve

The risk assessment progresses through draft, submitted, reviewed, and approved states.

04

Execute action items

Administrative controls can be completed directly while engineering controls can spawn work requests and linked execution workflows.

05

Recalculate residual risk

After evidence is submitted, the hazard status and residual exposure are reassessed inside the same record.

Compliance alignment

Structured records that are easier to review, defend, and audit.

Documented hazard control

Keep risk context, hazard definitions, and control actions in one controlled workflow.

Better proof for reviews

Reviewed-by and approved-by metadata make it easier to show who accepted the assessment.

Operational risk closeout

Residual risk is not theoretical; it is updated after control implementation and verification.

Industry relevance

Fit for industrial teams that need control, traceability, and speed.

Manufacturing

Manage machine guarding, area hazards, and action items that require both procedure and engineering work.

Utilities

Track area-based and equipment-based exposure across routine and shutdown operations.

Mining

Keep hazard controls visible from identification through verification in high-consequence environments.

FAQ

Questions teams ask before they replace spreadsheets and disconnected tools.

Can a risk assessment create downstream work when an engineering control is needed?

Yes. Sophtri can carry the workflow into work requests, JSA, and permit steps for engineered controls.

Does the system distinguish administrative controls from engineering controls?

Yes. The control type is captured on the hazard and can drive different follow-up workflows.

Can teams see residual risk after control implementation?

Yes. The hazard record can be updated after evidence is submitted so the residual risk and risk status reflect the new condition.

Request a demo

See how risk assessment software fits into your operating model.

We can walk through the workflow, approval points, reporting, and rollout approach for your facility. Typical follow-up: after request review.