Risk assessment software that follows the hazard all the way to verified control.
Sophtri lets teams create area and equipment assessments, document hazards, assign administrative and engineering controls, generate work requests, and recalculate residual risk after implementation.
Structured risk reviews
Move assessments from draft to submitted, reviewed, and approved status in one workflow.
Action items tied to control type
Track administrative and engineering controls differently while keeping them on one risk record.
Residual risk visibility
Reassess the hazard after implementation so teams can prove whether the control worked.
Buying teams need workflow fit, industry context, and measurable pilot outcomes.
Sophtri sales conversations stay anchored in operational control, audit-ready records, and the metrics a team can actually review during rollout.
ISO 45001, ISO 9001, and OSHA PSM-ready workflows
Sophtri is designed around structured approvals, documented information, corrective action, and audit-ready operational records.
Built for power, oil and gas, petrochemical, manufacturing, mining, and construction
The platform is positioned for industrial operations where work control, traceability, and role-based accountability matter every day.
Incidents, JSA, permits, CAPA, audits, and maintenance in one operating model
Teams can move from issue capture to approval, execution, verification, and closeout without rebuilding the record trail in separate tools.
Faster permit turnaround, lower CAPA aging, shorter audit prep, and cleaner closeout evidence
Proof conversations stay anchored in measurable operational outcomes instead of generic software feature claims.
Where teams struggle
High-risk operations break down when workflow context gets split across tools.
Sophtri turns risk assessment into an operational workflow. Teams can capture context, document hazards, add controls, submit the assessment for review, and then manage the downstream action items needed to reduce exposure. For engineering controls, the workflow can continue into work request, JSA, and permit execution before the residual risk is recalculated.
Risk registers often stop at identification and never prove whether controls were actually implemented.
Engineering controls need work packages, JSAs, and permits, but those steps are rarely connected back to the originating hazard.
Approvals and reviews are hard to track when assessments live in static spreadsheets or PDFs.
Teams cannot see the difference between planned controls and controls that are installed, verified, and reducing residual risk.
How Sophtri solves it
Built around the real operating sequence, not isolated forms.
Area and equipment context
Capture the production area, activities, headcount, housekeeping conditions, and other context before hazards are reviewed.
Hazards and control ownership
Attach control type, owner, due date, and description directly to the hazard record.
Administrative and engineering workflows
Handle briefing-style controls and engineered changes with the right downstream work path.
Work-request, JSA, and PTW linkage
Create the work package needed for engineering controls without leaving the risk context behind.
Workflow example
A controlled path from initiation to verified closeout.
Create the assessment
A user opens a new area or equipment assessment, selects the scale set, and enters the operational context.
Document hazards and controls
Each hazard receives control type, description, owner, and target date before the record moves forward.
Submit, review, and approve
The risk assessment progresses through draft, submitted, reviewed, and approved states.
Execute action items
Administrative controls can be completed directly while engineering controls can spawn work requests and linked execution workflows.
Recalculate residual risk
After evidence is submitted, the hazard status and residual exposure are reassessed inside the same record.
Compliance alignment
Structured records that are easier to review, defend, and audit.
Documented hazard control
Keep risk context, hazard definitions, and control actions in one controlled workflow.
Better proof for reviews
Reviewed-by and approved-by metadata make it easier to show who accepted the assessment.
Operational risk closeout
Residual risk is not theoretical; it is updated after control implementation and verification.
Industry relevance
Fit for industrial teams that need control, traceability, and speed.
Manufacturing
Manage machine guarding, area hazards, and action items that require both procedure and engineering work.
Utilities
Track area-based and equipment-based exposure across routine and shutdown operations.
Mining
Keep hazard controls visible from identification through verification in high-consequence environments.
Related pages
Explore the proof, industry, and workflow pages that connect around this solution.
Safety Management System
See how risk assessments connect to incidents, JSAs, permits, and operational control.
Explore page →
Permit to Work Software
Review the permit execution path that can follow an approved engineering control work package.
Explore page →
Asset Management System
Connect risk-driven engineering work to maintenance planning and closeout.
Explore page →
Industry and workflow pages
Keep this solution connected to the industry and use-case pages buyers search next.
Quality and CAPA Closeout Reference: From NCR Intake to Verified Resolution
This reference case study maps how industrial quality teams can keep NCR, CAPA, complaints, and final closure under one reviewable workflow.
Explore page →
Oil & Gas
Sophtri gives oil and gas operators a connected workflow for work requests, JSA, permits, LOTO coordination, risk actions, and audit-ready evidence across safety-critical operations.
Explore page →
Petrochemical
Sophtri connects hazard review, work requests, permits, findings, and corrective action so petrochemical teams can manage high-consequence work with stronger procedural control.
Explore page →
Mining
Sophtri helps mining teams connect field findings, equipment defects, maintenance work, JSA, permit control, and final verification so site leaders can act faster with better traceability.
Explore page →
ISO 45001 Compliance Workflows
Sophtri helps industrial teams support ISO 45001 with connected hazard review, work control, incident follow-up, audits, and documented evidence across the real operating sequence.
Explore page →
Defect-to-Closeout Workflow
Sophtri connects defect capture, work requests, JSA, permit authorization, execution, and final closure so industrial teams can move quickly without losing control or traceability.
Explore page →
FAQ
Questions teams ask before they replace spreadsheets and disconnected tools.
Can a risk assessment create downstream work when an engineering control is needed?
Yes. Sophtri can carry the workflow into work requests, JSA, and permit steps for engineered controls.
Does the system distinguish administrative controls from engineering controls?
Yes. The control type is captured on the hazard and can drive different follow-up workflows.
Can teams see residual risk after control implementation?
Yes. The hazard record can be updated after evidence is submitted so the residual risk and risk status reflect the new condition.
See how risk assessment software fits into your operating model.
We can walk through the workflow, approval points, reporting, and rollout approach for your facility. Typical response time: within one business day.